Defamation
The claimant, an unsuccessful candidate for County Sheriff, alleged that a
website owner allowed defamatory postings to be published on its website
which caused him to lose the election.
The publisher of an email newsletter faced suit for publishing an
allegation that the plaintiff possessed paintings looted by the Nazis
during World War II. A disgruntled contractor who had worked on the
plaintiff's house sent the newsletter publisher an email message
containing the allegations. The publisher distributed the email, which
contained the plaintiff's name, address and phone number, to subscribers.
A pathologist posted a message on a bulletin board accusing another
university affiliated doctor of receiving kickbacks from an outside
company in exchange for his assistance with the company's efforts to
obtain a contract to provide pathology services to the university. The
university doctor sued and a jury awarded him $675,000.
Privacy
Claimant sued an online magazine alleging it published his picture without
permission.
The operator of an online bulletin board filed suit against a couple who
posted many rude and threatening messages on the bulletin board. The
couple filed a counterclaim alleging the operator's use of cookies was
trespass, conversion and an invasion of privacy.
An online retailer attempted to sell its customers' personal information
to pay creditors as part of the retailer's bankruptcy. The retailer's
privacy policy had stated that personally identifiable information would
not be sold. Several parties threatened to sue on privacy grounds.
A company faced a class action lawsuit arising out of the company's
jukebox software, which allowed a user to store recorded music files on
his/her computer. The class alleged the software secretly recorded the
titles of the CDs and individual music tracks a user played on his/her
computer and sent the data back to the company, which then used the
information to create a detailed profile of the user's musical tastes.
Copyright
A distributor of software products acquired another company that sold
software pursuant to a license from plaintiff; the distributor continued
to sell this software after the acquisition. The plaintiff sued for
copyright infringement, alleging that the distributor's continued sale of
the software violated the terms of the license.
An online service that provided music for users to download for a fee was
sued by another company that allegedly owned rights to certain music. It
sued for copyright infringement, alleging that the service sold
unauthorized songs on the website. The service had obtained a license for
the music from a third party who claimed to have the rights to transfer,
but not from the claimant.
Owners of video footage sued a website owner for copyright infringement,
alleging the website streamed the footage for webcast on the site without
permission. There was an issue about whether the party from whom the
website owner had obtained the footage actually owned the rights in the
video footage to transfer.
A company created and licensed software that enabled golf courses to
advertise and display their courses online. Another company alleged the
software was substantially similar in function and appearance to its
software.
A company obtained articles from various print sources and sold the
articles to online archive websites. Free-lance authors sued the archive
websites, alleging that they had given permission for the use of their
articles in print format only, not for use in an electronic format. The
archive websites in turn notified the company that provided the articles
that they would seek indemnity if found liable to the authors.
Trademark
Plaintiff sued an online service provider for trademark infringement.
Plaintiff alleged that the provider's domain name violated trademark laws
because plaintiff owned the trademark and was in the business of selling
apparel, which was also one function of the provider's website.
A website provided information related to residential real estate sales.
Another company that published a traditional print magazine with the same
name used by the website and which also related to residential real estate
sales, sued for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
A business that used a competitor's trademarked name as a metatag on the
business website was sued by the competitor for trademark infringement and
unfair competition.
Unauthorized Access
A hacker infiltrated an online shopping website and stole 300,000 customer
credit card numbers. The website faced claims from the customers for
unauthorized charges made on the credit cards.
Companies that unknowingly spread a worm, virus or other corrupting file
via email to third parties could face liability from those third parties
for revenues lost as a result of the virus overloading the third parties'
computer network.
Errors, Omissions, Negligent Acts
A website owner sold an email list to a company that owned a different
website. The company sued, claiming the list had wrong addresses,
duplications, and contained names of people who did not want to receive
information from the company.
A company operated a website on which it conducted automobile auctions. A
purchaser of a vehicle sued alleging the photo showing the car he bought
was misleading and the person he spoke to about the car made
misrepresentations.
A company that bought banner ad space on a portal website sued the portal
operator. The company alleged the portal failed to make necessary changes
to the banner ads, and that the failure to make changes had reduced the
effectiveness of the ads.
A cosmetics company sued a search engine alleging that the search engine
engaged in trademark infringement and unfair competition by selling banner
advertising to another, competing cosmetics company. The search engine
sold the competitor a banner ad on the results page that came up when a
user entered the first company's name as a search term.
A company provided web site design and consulting services to a client.
The parties eventually decided to end their relationship and the company
sent its client a letter requesting payment of bills totaling $750,000.
The client responded by alleging that the websites designed by the company
had architectural and performance issues and demanded $9 million to settle
its claims.
A client sued a website developer alleging that its website crashed and
blamed the crash on the developer's failure to competently provide
services.
A company provided website construction and maintenance as well as
software for e-commerce applications. A client sued alleging their
website, launched with the company's assistance, did not function as
promised.
|